Most Beautiful Sri Lankan Currency notes under Ultra Violet Illumination.
S. W. R. D. Bandaranaike Portrait
Series 4: 1971-1974 notes
King Parakramabahu
Series 5: 1974-1977 notes
Armorial Ensign of Sri Lanka
Series 6: 1977 notes
Flora and Fauna
Series 7: 1979 notes
Historical and Archaeological
Series 8: 1981-1985 notes
Historical and Development
Series 9: 1987-1990 notes
Sri Lanka Heritage
Series 10: 1991-2006 notes
Development, Prosperity and Sri Lankan Dancers
Series 11: 2010-2019 notes
The Visual notes were scanned at 300 dpi and displayed at 50 dpi.
UV images also photographed at about 300 dpi with a Cannon Power Shot
SX620 HS Full HD 20.2 Mega Pixel using 3 MB (2048x1536).
Remember to switch off the Date option so that it does not overlay the
digital image of the note.
Camera mounted on a tripod and a UV lightbox fixed with two 8W 365nm
wavelength 288mm long Fluorescent tubes.
I find the 365nm gives
better images than 395nm which is also sold as UV light. Shorter
wavelengths should not be used as they are not safe for eyes and skin.
Older cameras may not be sensitive to UV wavelengths and may not give
good UV images.
To get uniform illumination for photography you need UV-tubes. The rechargeable UV torch is more convenient to carry with you and use when needed. UV-light is an essential part of a banknote collectors tool kit and are inexpensive in most major online stores. I have 50-year-old Unc notes that still show clear UV printing, so I infer UV does not degrade with time, if stored properly. Could have got partly rubbed away in a well used worn note. I am told UV is checked by PMG when notes are graded.
Unlike a scan a digital photograph will always be slightly trapezoidal showing the perspective effect, as the distance to the four corners of the images from center of camera lens are different. So using for example, PhotoShop Elements software application,